|
|
|
Emergency
Callout:
020 7353
6660
|
|
City of
London:
Tel: 020 7353 6660
Fax: 020 7353 6661
|
|
North
London:
The
Ivories
Crime
Dept
Tel: 020 7700 0070
Fax: 020 7619 9222
The
Ivories
Mental
Health Dept
Tel: 020 7704 9292
Fax: 020 7704 2999
|
|
South
London:
Elephant
& Castle
Crime
Dept
Tel: 020 7701 4747
Fax: 020 7703 8698
Elephant
& Castle
Mental
Health Dept
Tel: 020 7708 0700
Fax: 020 7703 8698
Elephant
& Castle
Public
Law Dept
Tel: 020 7708 0700
Fax: 020 7703 8698
|
|
Ashford Regional Offices, Kent:
Ashford
Tel: 01233 662002
Fax: 01233 662003
|
|
|
CLOSURE ORDERS
Since 20th January 2004 Magistrates
Courts have had a summary power to make a Closure Order in relation
to any premises. This has the effect of closing the premises for a
period of up to a maximum of 6 months. In order to make an Order a
Court must be satisfied that an Order is necessary and that the
premises are associated with the use, production or supply of class
a drugs and also associated with serious anti social behaviour.
Kaim Todner have an unsurpassed record
defending applications for Closure Orders.
It is clear that the police are widening their targets for Closure
Orders from merely residential premises to business premises –
particularly nightclubs, warehouses and public houses.
Kaim Todner are responsible for the three leading cases in this
rapidly developing area of law:-
Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis v Hooper [2005] EWHC 340
(Admin) : Articles 6 (right to a fair trial and Article 8 (right to
respect for family life) are both engaged in Closure Order
proceedings; the Magistrates Court has a general power to adjourn
proceedings for a Closure Order beyond the 14 day time limit
specified by the Anti Social Behaviour Act 2003 but only in
exceptional circumstances.
The Queen on the Application of Turner v Highbury Corner Magistrates
Court [2005] EWHC 2568 (Admin) : The Magistrates Court has a general
power to adjourn proceedings for a Closure Order beyond the 14 day
time limit specified by the Anti Social Behaviour Act 2003 where it
was in the interests of justice to do so.
The Queen on the Application of Cleary v Highbury Corner Magistrates
Court [2006] EWHC 1869 (Admin) : Applicants for Closure Orders
should not routinely seek to rely upon anonymous hearsay evidence
and the Courts should be readily prepared to give no weight at all
to cases based entirely on anonymous hearsay evidence; on an
application for a Closure Order the police had an obligation to
serve relevant evidence on the defence in advance of their
application to the Court; the general duty to disclose relevant
evidence to the defence included evidence that was likely to damage
the applicants case for a Closure Order.
Applications for Closure Orders are civil proceedings. They are
usually concluded very quickly. We are able to represent anyone with
an interest in the premises that are the subject of an application
for a Closure Order. We are able to represent clients on legal aid
where appropriate. |
|
|